The Effect of Age, Hypertension, and Overweight on Arterial Stiffness Assessed Using Carotid Wall Echo-Tracking in Childhood and Adolescence.

Arterial stiffness represents an independent predictor of the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. Early identification of high-risk individuals is necessary for effective prevention and targeted interventions. Carotid wall echo-tracking is a modern method for an accurate evaluation of the structural and functional properties of carotid arteries. This study aimed to assess age and sex-specific reference values of the echo-tracking parameters of carotid stiffness in 400 healthy children and adolescents and to evaluate the potential early effect of elevated blood pressure and overweight in 69 overweight normotensives, 45 white coat hypertensives, and 44 essential hypertensives. Stiffness index ß, pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep), arterial compliance (AC), and pulse wave velocity ß (PWV ß) were evaluated using Aloka ProSound F75. Both white coat and essential hypertension were associated with impaired carotid wall properties with the greatest effect on Ep, followed by PWV ß, index ß, and AC. The excess weight showed a weaker effect on Ep and PWV ß. This is the first study to compare the effects of white coat and essential hypertension on carotid arterial stiffness assessed using the echo-tracking technique in childhood and adolescence with direct application of pediatric reference values specific to age and sex.

The relationship between preoperative blood pressure during anesthetic examinations and pre-intubation blood pressure.

BACKGROUND: There have been few reports showing the relationship between blood pressure (BP) measured at clinics preoperatively and BP measured before anesthetic intubation/induction. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between BP measured at different times and settings preoperatively and BP measured before intubation/induction. METHODS: A total of 182 patients who underwent general anesthesia between March 2021 and April 2022 in a university hospital were examined. In addition to self-reported BP asked on an anesthetic examination sheet completed by each patient, BPs were measured three times, before, during, and after preoperative examination by the anesthesiologist. The derived parameter was compared with BP measured before intubation at the time of general anesthesia induction. RESULTS: The systolic BP in the intra-examination period had the most significant correlation with pre-intubation systolic BP (r = 0.5230, p < 0.0001, 95% CI = 0.4050 to 0.6238). On Bland-Altman analysis, the intra-examination systolic BP seemed to be similar and showed better agreement with pre-intubation systolic BP than other measured BPs, with a mean bias of 2.2 mmHg and the narrowest 95% limits of agreement (-33.7 to + 38.1 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative systolic BP value measured during the examination by the anesthesiologist was found to be closely related to pre-intubation systolic BP measured in the operating room. Higher BP during the preoperative examination may be a result of anxiety-induced stress or white-coat hypertension. Measuring BP during the anesthesiologist's examination may be useful for predicting hypertension in the pre-intubation period.

Assessing Utility of 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring to Distinguish Pediatric Populations Presenting with Elevated Blood Pressure in Rhode Island.

This retrospective study aimed to assess the value of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in distinguishing primary from secondary hypertension in pediatric patients. Our study was conducted on 293 patients referred to a pediatric nephrology clinic over 11 years. Various ABPM parameters were analyzed, including daytime and nighttime systolic and diastolic blood pressures, heart rate, and blood pressure load. Among the participants, 74% were normotensive (white-coat hypertension), 21.5% had primary hypertension, and 4.4% had secondary hypertension. There were no significant differences in the analyzed variables between primary and secondary hypertension groups. Our findings suggest that ABPM might not reliably differentiate between the two in this cohort. As white-coat hypertension becomes more prevalent, ABPM remains a valuable tool in preventing unnecessary workups in children without sustained hypertension. However, our study did not identify specific endpoints for distinguishing primary from secondary hypertension.

Development of preeclampsia in pregnant women with white-coat hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy are a significant cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. White coat hypertension (WCH) is a hypertensive disease characterized by an increased clinic blood pressure but normal home or workplace blood pressure. Due to variable prevalence, a subset of women with WCH may be incorrectly diagnosed with chronic hypertension, highlighting the need for accurate diagnosis. Little is known about the role of WCH in pregnancy, but a meta-analysis aims to determine whether WCH increases the likelihood of developing preeclampsia. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether there is an association between WCH and the incidence of preeclampsia in pregnant women. The search included PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until February 2023, using PRISMA guidelines. Pregnant women with apparent office hypertension throughout pregnancy who underwent 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring were included. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. RESULTS: This study included 12 studies with a total of 4,672 pregnant women and found that women with WCH have a higher risk of developing preeclampsia compared to normotensive women (RR: 2.29, 95% CI [1.18,4.43], P = 0.01). However, when compared with pregnant women with gestational hypertension or chronic hypertension, women with WCH had a significantly lower risk of developing preeclampsia ((RR: 0.39, [0.20,0.80], p=0.009) and (RR: 0.41, [0.27,0.62], P<0.001), respectively). CONCLUSION: The study recommends incorporating 24-hour ABPM into clinical practice to differentiate between chronic hypertension and WCH in early pregnancy and focus on special management for those who need it. The findings may guide future research on ABPM's role in diagnosing WCH and its effects on pregnancy outcomes.

The HOPE Asia Network consensus on blood pressure measurements corresponding to office measurements: Automated office, home, and ambulatory blood pressures.

For adopting recently introduced hypertension phenotypes categorized using office and out of office blood pressure (BP) for the diagnosis of hypertension and antihypertension drug therapy, it is mandatory to define the corresponding out of office BP with the specific target BP recommended by the major guidelines. Such conditions include white-coat hypertension (WCH), masked hypertension (MH), white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), and masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH). Here, the authors review the relevant literature and discuss the related issue to facilitate the use of corresponding BPs for proper diagnosis of WCH, MH, WUCH, and MUCH in the setting of standard target BP as well as intensive target BP. The methodology of deriving the corresponding BP has evolved from statistical methods such as standard deviation, percentile value, and regression to an outcome-based approach using pooled international cohort study data and comparative analysis in randomized clinical trials for target BPs such as the SPRINT and STEP studies. Corresponding BPs to 140/90 and 130/80 mm Hg in office BP is important for safe and strict achievement of intensive BP targets. The corresponding home, daytime, and 24-h BPs to 130/80 mm Hg in office BP are 130/80, 130/80, and 125/75 mm Hg, respectively. However, researchers have found some discrepancies among the home corresponding BPs. As tentative criterion for de-escalation of antihypertensive therapy as shown in European guidelines was 120 mm Hg in office BP, corresponding home, daytime, and 24-h systolic BPs to 120 mm Hg in office systolic BP are 120, 120, and 115 mm Hg, respectively.

Identifying barriers and utility of obtaining ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in a pediatric chronic kidney disease population.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a prevalent complication of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of obtaining ABPM and to identify barriers to ABPM in this pediatric patient population. METHOD: In this retrospective analysis of patients with CKD stage 3-5 who were seen in one academic medical center's outpatient Pediatric Nephrology clinics between 2018 and 2021, we performed logistic regression to evaluate for associations between demographic factors and odds of having an ABPM. RESULT: Among 96 patients included in the study, 48 patients carried a diagnosis of hypertension. 31 patients had ABPM performed with usable data. In those who had ABPM done, 21 had normotension and 10 had undertreated hypertension. Our study also showed 1 had masked hypertension and 5 had white coat hypertension or effect. We did not find a statistically significant difference in those who did or did not undergo ABPM evaluation based on gender, previous diagnosis of hypertension, distance from clinic, language preference, or racial or ethnic identity. CONCLUSION: ABPM is a useful tool in our CKD population for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. We did not identify specific barriers to ABPM in our CKD population, and there were no differences in patients who obtained ABPM when looking at specific demographic and disease characteristics. Given these findings, we recommend focusing on areas of future improvement in spheres of patient and provider education as well as better quantification using surveys to further illuminate barriers.

Seasonal variation in blood pressure: what is still missing?

Seasonal variation of blood pressure (BP) is a topic in cardiology that has gained more attention throughout the years. Although it is extensively documented that BP increases in seasons coupled with lower temperatures, there are still many gaps in this knowledge field that need to be explored. Notably, seasonal variation of BP phenotypes, such as masked and white coat hypertension, and the impact of air pollution, latitude, and altitude on seasonal variation of BP are still poorly described in the literature, and the levels of the existing evidence are low. Therefore, further investigations on these topics are needed to provide robust evidence that can be used in clinical practice.

White-coat hypertension in pregnant women: risk factors, pregnancy outcomes, and biomarkers.

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are a worldwide health problem for women. They cause complications in up to 10% of pregnancies and are associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Traditional blood pressure measurement in clinical practice is the most commonly used procedure for diagnosing and monitoring hypertension treatment, but it is prone to significant inaccuracies caused, on the one hand, by the inherent variability of blood pressure and, on the other, by errors arising from measurement technique and conditions. Some studies have demonstrated a better estimate of the prognosis for the development of cardiovascular diseases using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. We can detect white-coat hypertension using this method, which helps to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment in many cases, and we can also detect masked hypertension, which helps to avoid underdiagnosis and a lack of prescribed treatment if needed. White-coat hypertension is not a benign condition - it has been shown to be associated with higher risks of developing preeclampsia, preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age babies. In this regard, it is extremely important for clinicians to be aware of the risk factors and outcomes associated with this condition. Pregnant women should be medically monitored both during pregnancy and after delivery to detect target organ damage, cardiovascular risk factors, or a metabolic syndrome.

Circadian Urinary Excretion of Water, and Not Salt, Is Affected by the White Coat Effect.

Hypertension is an important morbidity factor. The prognostic consequences of the white-coat effect have been studied extensively. The repercussion on the circadian rhythm of urinary water and salt excretion in the same subgroup remain, conversely, among the open topics. Postulating an impaired diurnal sodium and volume excretion we decided to investigate both, in subjects with or without a white-coat effect, in the general population. A sample of 1023 subjects, has been considered. We collected 24-h urine samples, divided in day and night, and we measured the blood pressure with an Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM). ABPM values were then compared with physician collected in-office values to assign subjects to the group with or without the white-coat effect. Concerning the circadian pattern of urinary sodium excretion, we found no significant differences between the groups. There was instead in the white-coat effect group a higher night/day ratio of urinary water excretion. The white-coat effect, has been considered a potential hypertension precursor, and its consequent handling could be prospectively relevant in hypertension prevention. The absence of repercussions on the urinary circadian sodium excretion pattern and on the potentially related risk factors in subjects with a white coat effect is reassuring. The clinical significance of the impact on the night/day ratio of water excretion needs to be further investigated.

The Use of Telemedicine to Improve Hypertension in an Urban Primary Care Clinic and Predictors of Improved Blood Pressure.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of telemedicine in blood pressure (BP) management when compared to conventional care. We initiated a hypertension telehealth clinic in our urban primary care clinic and through this study aim to evaluate the strengths and limitations of telemedicine in hypertension (HTN) control. The primary outcome of the study is to identify the proportion of patients with improved HTN. Secondary outcomes included identifying: predictors for lower BP, predictors of missing telehealth appointments, and comorbid conditions that are more likely to necessitate use of more than 1 antihypertensive medication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients seen in the HTN telehealth clinic from May 1st, 2022 to October 31st, 2022 were identified. A retrospective chart review was done to compare the BP during in-person visit prior to first telehealth visit, telehealth visit home BP readings and last recorded in-office BP on chart at end of study period. Descriptive statistical analysis, Chi Square test, and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze data. RESULTS: Of the 234 appointments, 83% were conducted and 154 patients were seen. A remarkable decrease in percentage of patients with BP >140/90 was seen when comparing in-office visit BP to first telehealth visit home BP, 72% versus 45% respectively. No remarkable difference was noted in percentage of patients with BP >140/90 when comparing first telehealth visit home BP to last in-office BP recorded on chart, 45% and 41% respectively. Patients with diabetes had lower odds of missing appointments, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.34 ([0.12-0.91], P = .03). Patients with partners were more likely to have lower BP at the telehealth visit, aOR:3.2 ([1.15-9.86], P = .03) while patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (aOR 0.27 ([0.08-0.77], P = .02) and CAD, aOR 0.24 ([0.06-0.8], P = .03) were less likely to have lower BP. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated telemedicine as a great tool to prevent overtreatment of hypertension as significant difference between in-office BP and home BP during telehealth visits was noted. We did not see a significant change in blood pressure when comparing home BP at first telehealth visit to the last in-person clinic BP at end of study period.

Prevalence of persistent hypertension and situational hypertension in a population of elderly cats in The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic arterial hypertension is increasingly recognised and can have serious adverse consequences in cats. Unfortunately, the act of measuring blood pressure itself may cause an increase in blood pressure, known as situational hypertension. It is currently unknown how often this phenomenon occurs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of persistent hypertension and situational hypertension in an elderly population of cats in a first-opinion clinic and to assess which factors were associated with systolic hypertension. METHODS: In this prospective study, systolic blood pressure was measured in 185 cats aged ⩾10 years using the Doppler sphygmomanometry method according to the recommendations of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement. Age, sex, body weight, body condition score, position during blood pressure measurement and apparent stress level were assessed. If a systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg was found, measurements were repeated to evaluate if persistent hypertension or situational hypertension was present. The first set of blood pressure measurements were used for all the statistical analyses. RESULTS: The median systolic blood pressure for this population was 140 mmHg. The prevalence of persistent hypertension was at least 14.6% and situational hypertension at least 5.4%. Factors significantly associated with hypertension were age, higher apparent stress levels and a sitting position during measurement. Sex, body weight or body condition score did not significantly influence systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Both persistent hypertension and situational hypertension are common in elderly cats. There are no reliable parameters to distinguish between the two, underlining the importance of a standard protocol and repeating measurements during a follow-up visit when hypertension is found. Age, demeanour and body position during blood pressure measurement influenced blood pressure in this population of elderly cats.

Possible cardiovascular risks of white coat hypertension: updated.

White-coat hypertension (WCH) has been defined as an increased blood pressure (BP) in the doctor's office and a normal BP outside the office by 24 hr ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP measurement. It is generated by fear and anxiety of whether an abnormal value could be found and indicate the existence of hypertension. When first described, it was defined as a neuro-defense reaction related to the presence of the doctor in their office or clinic and associated with an increase in heart rate. Initially it was considered a benign condition, not associated with the hypertension mediated organ damage (HMOD) and not requiring treatment. However, recent studies have shown that WCH is not a benign condition and is associated with HMOD and cardiovascular (CV) events (CVE). According to recent ACC/AHA guidelines, the outside of office normal BP should be < 130/80 mmHg and according to the ESC/ESH guidelines, the outside of office normal BP should be < 135/85 mmHg. The prevalence of WCH varies by different studies from 15% to 40% and up to 50% in older subjects. Currently, the management of WCH if not associated with CV risk factors should be conservative with healthy lifestyle changes and exercise. Drug therapy should be considered if these measures do not work or in the presence of CV risk factors, HMOD, or preexisting cardiovascular disease.

White Coat Effect: Is It Because of the Hospital Setting, or Is It Physician-Induced?

INTRODUCTION: White coat hypertension (WCH) patients are those individuals who have high blood pressure (BP) in the medical environment but are normal during their daily activities. White coat hypertensive patients with normal daytime ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) rapidly progress to sustained hypertension. WCH is mainly treated with non-pharmacological methods. Alpha-1 agonists and beta blockers are logical treatment choices for patients with fixed hypertension with the White Coat Effect (WCE). Masked hypertension patients are those individuals who have normal values at the doctor's office but elevated BP at home or during 24-hour ABPM (24-hour or daytime). ABPM is a more practical and reliable method for detecting patients with WCH. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This observational study was conducted at Dayanand Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, over the course of one year (December 2015 to November 2016). The primary objective of the study was to determine whether there was a difference in blood pressure readings between the home setting and the hospital setting. The secondary objective was to determine whether the difference, if present, between the hospital and home readings was due to the hospital setting, physician presence, or a combination of both. Patients with stage 1 hypertension were included in the study, irrespective of antihypertensive treatment. Patients with ischemic heart disease, chronic liver failure, and chronic kidney disease who could not follow protocol instructions were excluded. RESULTS: In our study, the mean age of patients was 53.91±12.86 years. The patient's mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) readings at the hospital were higher than their home readings (p-0.012; p-0.001, respectively). Mean hospital SBP and DBP readings recorded by the physician were higher than readings recorded by patients alone at home (p-0.002; p-0.014, respectively) and alone at the hospital (p-0.004; p-0.001, respectively). BP readings taken by the physician with a manual sphygmomanometer were significantly lower than those taken with a digital sphygmomanometer by patients and physicians in all settings (p<0.05). The mean rise in BP was significant in both the physician's presence and the hospital environment (p<0.05 for both), and this rise was more significantly associated with the hospital effect than the physician effect (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Misdiagnosis of hypertension results in inappropriate prescription and overuse of antihypertensive medications for individuals who are not persistently hypertensive. So it is very important to rule out WCH in both the hospital setting and the physician's presence, more precisely by ABPM. WCH can be diagnosed with regular BP monitoring by a digital sphygmomanometer at home.

Physiotherapy Screening for Referral of a Patient with Patent Foramen Ovale Presenting with Neck Pain as Primary Complaint: A Case Report.

Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder encountered by physiotherapists. However, it may be the early manifestation of more alarming conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases mimicking musculoskeletal pain. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital heart defect consisting of a small opening between the right and the left atrium. A 56-year-old male presented with neck pain and head heaviness as primary complaints. The cardiovascular profile and the behavioral symptoms led the physiotherapist to find an exaggerated blood pressure response during exercise; in addition to subtle neurological signs, this prompted the physiotherapist to make an urgent referral. At the emergency department a PFO was diagnosed. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case to describe a rare clinical presentation of a PFO presenting neck pain as primary complaint. This case report emphasizes the importance for physiotherapists to be able to triage patients for conditions outside their scope suggestive of further medical investigation.

Office blood pressure versus ambulatory blood pressure measurement in childhood obesity.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity-related co-morbidities is rising parallel to the childhood obesity epidemic. High blood pressure (BP), as one of these co-morbidities, is detected nowadays at increasingly younger ages. The diagnosis of elevated BP and hypertension, especially in the childhood population, presents a challenge to clinicians. The added value of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in relation to office blood pressure (OBP) measurements in obese children is unclear. Furthermore, it is unknown how many overweight and obese children have an abnormal ABPM pattern. In this study we evaluated ABPM patterns in a population of overweight and obese children and adolescents, and compared these patterns with regular OBP measurements. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study in overweight or obese children and adolescents aged 4-17 years who were referred to secondary pediatric obesity care in a large general hospital in The Netherlands, OBP was measured during a regular outpatient clinic visit. Additionally, all participants underwent a 24-hour ABPM on a regular week-day. Outcome measures were OBP, mean ambulatory SBP and DBP, BP load (percentage of readings above the ambulatory 95th blood pressure percentiles), ambulatory BP pattern (normal BP, white-coat hypertension, elevated BP, masked hypertension, ambulatory hypertension), and BP dipping. RESULTS: We included 82 children aged 4-17 years. They had a mean BMI Z-score of 3.3 (standard deviation 0.6). Using ABPM, 54.9% of the children were normotensive (95% confidence interval 44.1-65.2), 26.8% had elevated BP, 9.8% ambulatory hypertension, 3.7% masked hypertension, and 4.9% white-coat hypertension. An isolated night-time BP load > 25% was detected in almost a quarter of the children. 40% of the participants lacked physiologic nocturnal systolic BP dipping. In the group of children with normal OBP, 22.2% turned out to have either elevated BP or masked hypertension on ABPM. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a high prevalence of abnormal ABPM patterns in overweight or obese children and adolescents was detected. Additionally, OBP poorly correlated with the child's actual ABPM pattern. Herewith, we emphasized the usefulness of ABPM as an important diagnostic tool in this population.

Controversies in Hypertension III: Dipping, Nocturnal Hypertension, and the Morning Surge.

A comprehensive approach to hypertension requires out-of-office determinations by home or ambulatory monitoring. The 4 phenotypes comparing office and out-of-office pressures in treated and untreated patients include normotension, hypertension, white-coat phenomena, and masked phenomena. Components of out-of-office pressure may be equally as important as mean values. Nighttime pressures are normally 10%-20% lower than daytime (normal "dipping") pressures. Abnormalities include dipping more than 20% (extreme dippers), less than 10 % (nondippers), or rising above daytime (risers) and have been associated with elevated cardiovascular risk. Nighttime pressure may be elevated (nocturnal hypertension) in isolation or together with daytime hypertension. Isolated nocturnal hypertension theoretically changes white-coat hypertension to true hypertension and normotension to masked hypertension. Pressure normally peaks in the morning hours ("morning surge") when cardiovascular events are most common. Morning hypertension may result from residual nocturnal hypertension or an exaggerated surge and has been associated with enhanced cardiovascular risk, especially in Asian populations. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether altering therapy based solely on either abnormal dipping, isolated nocturnal hypertension, or an abnormal surge is justified.

The many faces of hypertension in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Several disturbed blood pressure (BP) patterns, including disparities between office and out-of-office BP measurements (such as white-coat and masked hypertension), disturbed circadian BP variability (such as abnormal dipping patterns and nocturnal hypertension) and treatment-resistant hypertension, are common in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Consequently, office or home BP measurements alone may not reflect real BP variation and may lead to inadequate diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. The early detection of these disturbed BP patterns is especially crucial in individuals with type 1 diabetes, as these patterns may indicate future development of adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. In this review we will describe these disturbed BP patterns and discuss recent findings on their prevalence and outcomes. We will also address critical areas for future research to determine the true prevalence and prognosis of disturbed BP patterns, and to optimize and improve the knowledge and management of high-risk individuals with type 1 diabetes and disturbed BP patterns.